Biography

The Twelve Lives of Alfred Hitchcock: An Anatomy of the Master of Suspense

The Twelve Lives of Alfred Hitchcock: An Anatomy of the Master of Suspense

  • Downloads：1827
  • Type：Epub+TxT+PDF+Mobi
  • Create Date：2021-04-30 08:51:23
  • Update Date：2025-09-06
  • Status：finish
  • Author：Edward White
  • ISBN：1324002395
  • Environment：PC/Android/iPhone/iPad/Kindle
  • Download

Summary

In The Twelve Lives of Alfred Hitchcock， Edward White explores the Hitchcock phenomenon—what defines it， how it was invented， what it reveals about the man at its core， and how its legacy continues to shape our cultural world。


The book’s twelve chapters illuminate different aspects of Hitchcock’s life and work: “The Boy Who Couldn’t Grow Up”; “The Murderer”; “The Auteur”; “The Womanizer”; “The Fat Man”; “The Dandy”; “The Family Man”; “The Voyeur”; “The Entertainer”; “The Pioneer”; “The Londoner”; “The Man of God。” Each of these angles reveals something fundamental about the man he was and the mythological creature he has become， presenting not just the life Hitchcock lived but also the various versions of himself that he projected， and those projected on his behalf。


From Hitchcock’s early work in England to his most celebrated films， White astutely analyzes Hitchcock’s oeuvre and provides new interpretations。 He also delves into Hitchcock’s ideas about gender; his complicated relationships with “his women”—not only Grace Kelly and Tippi Hedren but also his female audiences—as well as leading men such as Cary Grant， and writes movingly of Hitchcock’s devotion to his wife and lifelong companion， Alma， who made vital contributions to numerous classic Hitchcock films， and burnished his mythology。 And White is trenchant in his assessment of the Hitchcock persona， so carefully created that Hitchcock became not only a figurehead for his own industry but nothing less than a cultural icon。


Ultimately， White’s portrayal illuminates a vital truth: Hitchcock was more than a Hollywood titan; he was the definitive modern artist， and his significance reaches far beyond the confines of cinema。

Download

Reviews

Jerry James ，

I am somewhat of a Hitchcock biography junkie and this is the best one I’ve ever read。 Not only is it the best Hitchcock bio， it is one of the best bios in general！Most biographies tend to follow a chronological template and while there’s nothing wrong with that， they often neglect the subject’s later life。 They focus on the formative and exciting ‘hot’ years when the subject accomplished their claim to fame。 The subject’s life is dutifully followed through whatever tragedy or triumph is most in I am somewhat of a Hitchcock biography junkie and this is the best one I’ve ever read。 Not only is it the best Hitchcock bio， it is one of the best bios in general！Most biographies tend to follow a chronological template and while there’s nothing wrong with that， they often neglect the subject’s later life。 They focus on the formative and exciting ‘hot’ years when the subject accomplished their claim to fame。 The subject’s life is dutifully followed through whatever tragedy or triumph is most interesting for a time， and if a catharsis is included then that is obviously showcased， but often a healthy chunk of their life is just glossed over （the ‘unexciting’ part）。 And by doing this the subject’s life often comes off unfairly as depressing to the reader especially in the last chapters。 When bios do it right they give the subject’s WHOLE life， even the later years， full consideration。 Two film bios in the past year about music artists did just that: Tina and Zappa。 These gave wonderful attention to the artist’s FULL lives。 White’s solution/innovation is to approach the subject’s life in a non-chronological fashion and focus on different aspects that round out the person。 In Hitchcock’s case White writes about “twelve lives” such as: “Tho Boy Who Couldn’t Grow Up，” “The Auteur，” “The Womanizer，” “The Dandy，” “The Pioneer。” These angles overlap each other and flesh out a more complete picture of Hitchcock and his ENTIRE life。 The good and the bad have better context。 As White writes in the intro， “…contradictions have encouraged astonishingly diverse interpretations of Hitchcock。 The reading of him as lecherous ogre competes with the image of Hitchcock the uxorious husband。 Hitchcock the brooding artist is countered by Hitchcock the vaudevillian。 The dyspeptic misanthrope identified by some contrasts with the hopeless romantic that others recognize when they delve into Hitchcock’s filmography。”His mythology， his genius， his flaws become more human when you deal with him as different components that make up a whole。 You come away knowing him as a full human being， and that’s exactly what a biography should do。 Most surprisingly though， this approach also allowed a freer and deeper exploration into the details/technique of Hitchcock’s craft as a director （something many other bios have failed at）。I am excited for other biographers to follow White’s approach。 It seems to be a much better and more satisfying way to write a biography。 。。。more

Jennifer ，

Audiobook narrated by Qarie Marshall。 Done clear and concise which made it very enjoyable to listen to。 50 years and 53 films。 My favorite was Rebecca。 Have you seen it？ It was and still is a black and white film。 That in my opinion is one of the greatest films I ever seen。 I was a young adult and loved it。 Anxiety， fear， paranoia， guilt and shame are the emotional engines that drove his films。 He was a son， brother， husband， father， grandfather。 But first and foremost he was a talented director Audiobook narrated by Qarie Marshall。 Done clear and concise which made it very enjoyable to listen to。 50 years and 53 films。 My favorite was Rebecca。 Have you seen it？ It was and still is a black and white film。 That in my opinion is one of the greatest films I ever seen。 I was a young adult and loved it。 Anxiety， fear， paranoia， guilt and shame are the emotional engines that drove his films。 He was a son， brother， husband， father， grandfather。 But first and foremost he was a talented director。 This book explores Hitchcock and the relationship with his films and: t•tWomen’s roles in his films t•tHis relationships with screenwriters t•tHis body image and the public t•tHis dedication to clothing t•tvoyeurism t•tCatholicism I throughly enjoyed this and recommend it if you love AH。 Thanks Dreamscape Media via Netgalley。 I’ve voluntarily given my review。 。。。more

Bookreporter。com Biography & Memoir ，

Every few years， it seems that a new biography comes out about a celebrity that alters the perception long held by fans and even peers。 THE TWELVE LIVES OF ALFRED HITCHCOCK falls into this category。Edward White， author of THE TASTEMAKER: Carl Van Vechten and the Birth of Modern America， “dissects” Hitchcock into what could be considered multiple personalities， each one supposedly contributing to his genius （although when reading some passages， one might call the legendary director an evil genius Every few years， it seems that a new biography comes out about a celebrity that alters the perception long held by fans and even peers。 THE TWELVE LIVES OF ALFRED HITCHCOCK falls into this category。Edward White， author of THE TASTEMAKER: Carl Van Vechten and the Birth of Modern America， “dissects” Hitchcock into what could be considered multiple personalities， each one supposedly contributing to his genius （although when reading some passages， one might call the legendary director an evil genius）。We have seen some of the material within White’s overview before: Hitchcock’s obsession with blondes; his “voyeurism”; his legacy as a pioneer and auteur; the way he （mis）treated his actors， especially the women; and his childhood fear of police and authority。 But what is especially interesting are chapters covering his attitudes regarding style and fashion， religion， and even his own weight issues。Hitchcock was probably no better or worse than many of his contemporaries。 He could be petulant， sarcastic and downright mean， but he was also a staunch family man and willing to take chances where others wouldn’t。 I’m sure some of his performers and crew members could tell stories about perceived abuse， pettiness and jealousy， which was all part of the game。 So in that regard， was Hitchcock more of a bad egg because he didn’t like to share the spotlight or credit with others （save his beloved wife， Alma）？ Was he especially harsh on his actresses， like Tippi Hedren， Kim Novak and Grace Kelly？The chapter “The Dandy” was especially entertaining and illuminating as we learn about the attention to detail taken when it came to wardrobe and set furnishings。 Describing the elegant designs for Rope， which was set in New York and was one of Hitchcock's more technically original （if not box-office successful） films， White writes， “It was a material existence that Hitchcock understood， for it mirrored his own。 It was he who guided the selection of the artworks to be hung on the apartment walls; he who stipulated the color of [the actors’] suits。 Despite looking like a staid British bank manager， Hitchcock apportioned great depth to the surface of things。 He wasn’t showy or decorative in his dress， but he was committed to the perfection of appearance as a way of exerting control over himself and the world around him。”White doesn’t get into the nitty-gritty about Hitchcock’s filmography as Francois Truffaut did in HITCHCOCK。 But it’s just this type of inspection that sets his book apart from previous examinations。However， this is not a perfect book by any means。 Some readers might look askance as the author seems to take a certain pleasure in pointing out Hitchcock’s not insubstantial faults， although those looking for gossipy tidbits might enjoy such disclosures。 Similarly， there is a haughty film studies feeling in spots where White might discuss aspects of the movies beyond the casual fan’s education。Overall， though， THE TWELVE LIVES OF ALFRED HITCHCOCK makes a worthy addition to the cinephile’s library and undoubtedly will appeal to Hitchcock devotees。Reviewed by Ron Kaplan 。。。more

Mystic Miraflores ，

This is a detailed biography of a very complex genius who had many talents as well as many flaws。 I remember as a child growing up in the 1960s watching "The Birds"， "Rope"， and "Rear Window" as well as the Alfred Hitchcock television series， with my late father， who was a fan of mysteries and thrillers。 He passed that interest on to me。 During the schoolhouse scene in "The Birds"， I was absolutely terrified as the children in the movie were the same age as I was。 I enjoyed this book but because This is a detailed biography of a very complex genius who had many talents as well as many flaws。 I remember as a child growing up in the 1960s watching "The Birds"， "Rope"， and "Rear Window" as well as the Alfred Hitchcock television series， with my late father， who was a fan of mysteries and thrillers。 He passed that interest on to me。 During the schoolhouse scene in "The Birds"， I was absolutely terrified as the children in the movie were the same age as I was。 I enjoyed this book but because of its sheer length and density， often there were repetitions of the same type of information in various chapters。 This book has whetted my appetite for more information on Alma。 I know there is a 2003/2004 book co-written by her daughter， Pat。 I may look for that book now。 。。。more

Rob Smith ，

Pretty good read！ Hitchcock is interesting but not read a 1200 page bio interesting to me。 This thematically ordered biography worked very nicely。

Mark Schoen ，

Hitchcock has a history of controlling， harassing， and even assaulting women。 I’m usually able to separate the director from the movies themselves—since there are so many other， wonderful people collaborating on both sides of the camera—but it’s not easy in this case， and maybe it shouldn’t be。 Nevertheless， I acknowledge that this isn’t the story of a single bad apple and that Hitchcock’s behavior is a symptom of a much deeper and systemic issue in Hollywood’s past and present。

Jaksen ，

Well-researched book about a highly talented and controversial figure in 20th century film-making， and I own it。That Hitchcock was talented， no doubt。 Could do everything on a movie and often did。 Directed， wrote， produced， worked on lighting， props， sound， transitional elements， special effects - could do it all。 That he gave women work， plum jobs， credit， attention， also no doubt。 That he deserves a special place in film history for his body of work， again， again， no doubts there。 That he also Well-researched book about a highly talented and controversial figure in 20th century film-making， and I own it。That Hitchcock was talented， no doubt。 Could do everything on a movie and often did。 Directed， wrote， produced， worked on lighting， props， sound， transitional elements， special effects - could do it all。 That he gave women work， plum jobs， credit， attention， also no doubt。 That he deserves a special place in film history for his body of work， again， again， no doubts there。 That he also had a somewhat seamy side， which was rare， but happened， yes， yes again。 One thing though， when he made what we older folk would call 'a pass，' he didn't force the issue。 He could also treat his actors like they were parts of the set - a light？ a shoe on the floor？ - yes again。 There are many stories of actors actively disliking the man， but just as many where actors enjoyed working with him。 Hitchcock came from a lower-middle class background， and in English terms， an acceptable one。 He was an East Londoner and could affect a Cockney accent when it suited him。 In 1939 he left England for the US， where he became an even bigger success than he already was。 His films will go on forever， though he himself will be tainted by a few incidents which don't do him proud。In many cases， with a man like this， I'd prob。 say nah， not gonna read HIM anymore， or watch HIS films ever again。 Can't do this here。 This man was too complicated。 He was teased and adored， berated for his weight， which he struggled to contain， and praised for his talent behind the camera。 This particular book divides Hitchcock into his many 'personae' - the Londoner， the Auteur， the Family Man， the Man of God， etc。 Anyone of us could prob。 do the same with our own lives。 （I'd be the Child， the Teacher， the One Who Drove Her Mother Crazy; you get the drift。）At any rate， I found it a fascinating and thoroughly truthful read， with both sides represented as concerns some of the charges levied against him。 Most of the actresses who worked with him found him to be a kind gentleman， though he expected a lot from them when it came to their acting roles。 But this does happen even today。 If one is accused of harassment， there'll be a dozen who say， 'not with me， he wasn't！' But my focus on reading this book was on the films: how he made them， what were his sources， why did he choose that book or that writer， how did he get that effect， how did he interact with Jimmy Stewart， Cary Grant， Doris Day， Sean Connery - four of my fav。 actors。 So overall， four stars。 。。。more

Kevin ，

While dozens of books on Alfred Hitchcock （1899-1980） already exist， Edward White （"The Tastemaker: Carl Van Vechten and the Birth of Modern America"） sidesteps familiarity with an inventive and clever new way to present his biography and critical assessment of the filmmaker。 Rather than tell Hitchcock's life in chronological order， White has written 12 lengthy chapters， each presenting a different aspect of his subject。 "Only when all twelve are seen together will the full picture be complete，" While dozens of books on Alfred Hitchcock （1899-1980） already exist， Edward White （"The Tastemaker: Carl Van Vechten and the Birth of Modern America"） sidesteps familiarity with an inventive and clever new way to present his biography and critical assessment of the filmmaker。 Rather than tell Hitchcock's life in chronological order， White has written 12 lengthy chapters， each presenting a different aspect of his subject。 "Only when all twelve are seen together will the full picture be complete，" he writes。The chapters （or "lives"） begins with "The Boy Who Couldn't Grow Up，" which examines Hitchcock's childhood phobias that seemingly lasted his entire life。 "The Murderer" posits "Hitchcock had a lifelong fascination with cruelty and violence that fueled his creativity。" "The Auteur" shows how Hitchcock's persona changed after decades of being regarded as merely a Hollywood hit-maker until French critics declared him an "artiste" in the mid-1960s。 One of the more fascinating chapters is "The Womanizer，" which looks at Hitchcock's wildly conflicted treatment of women on and off screen。 Hitchcock was， White writes， "caught between feelings of admiration and resentment， identification and estrangement， an instinct to worship and a desire to control。" Other fascinating chapters include "The Voyeur，" "The Entertainer，" "The Dandy" and "The Fat Man，" which poignantly examines his lifelong relationship with food （"the source of joy and companionship， disgust and shame"）。 The final chapter begins in 1979 with Hitchcock in failing health and closing down his office at Universal studios。 "Life away from work proved an oxymoron，" writes White。White's clever， authoritative and opinionated critical biography of Hitchcock is a treat for film buffs。Edward White's outstanding Alfred Hitchcock biography divides his epic life and film output into 12 insightful and fascinating chapters， creating a vibrant portrait。 。。。more

Christopher Owens ，

Subtitle: A Fresh， Innovative Interpretation of the Life， Work， and Lasting Influence of the Twentieth Century’s Most Iconic FilmmakerI received an advance reader copy of this book from the publisher through Net Galley in exchange for an honest review。This book isn’t a pure biography， in that it doesn’t proceed through the subject’s life in any organized manner。 Instead， this book is an examination of Alfred Hitchcock’s life in terms of twelve different aspects of his life that could be seen as Subtitle: A Fresh， Innovative Interpretation of the Life， Work， and Lasting Influence of the Twentieth Century’s Most Iconic FilmmakerI received an advance reader copy of this book from the publisher through Net Galley in exchange for an honest review。This book isn’t a pure biography， in that it doesn’t proceed through the subject’s life in any organized manner。 Instead， this book is an examination of Alfred Hitchcock’s life in terms of twelve different aspects of his life that could be seen as defining him as an artist， celebrity， and person。 By necessity， it consists of a lot of biographical information。I won’t go into the details of all twelve aspects here， but will instead highlight a few of them:The Murderer – Many of Hitchcock’s films feature at least one murder。 It was interesting to be able to track the murders and Hitchcock’s presentation of them across the body of his work。The Womanizer – Hitchcock was known for being a bit difficult with the actresses featured in his films and for crafting films that put his female characters into extremely stressful situations。 He also believed that he made films that appealed specifically to female viewers。The Fat Man – This section examined Hitchcock’s weight through the years， including his attempts to lose weight， and his self-deprecating humor concerning his weight。The Entertainer – At the peak of his career， Hitchcock was considered a bigger box office draw for his films than the actors that starred in them。 As a result， often was featured in the movie trailers and commercials for them。 This section also looked at how Hitchcock became a multi-media star， with his television shows， books， and magazines that used his name to sell copies。I gave The Twelve Lifetimes of Alfred Hitchcock four stars on Goodreads。 As a result of learning about a wider variety of Hitchcock films， I put a couple of DVDs on hold at our library。 One is North By Northwest， and the other is 2012’s Hitchcock， which tells the story behind the making of Psycho。 。。。more

Kristine ，

The Twelve Lives of Alfred Hitchcock by Edward White is a free NetGalley ebook that I read in mid-March。Chapters are assigned for the life aspects of roles that had been fulfilled in Hitchcock's life and would define his image & filmmaking。 It's all very clipped with every phrase and every snippet of an interview having a bearing on his future and toward influencing other writers and directors。 The Twelve Lives of Alfred Hitchcock by Edward White is a free NetGalley ebook that I read in mid-March。Chapters are assigned for the life aspects of roles that had been fulfilled in Hitchcock's life and would define his image & filmmaking。 It's all very clipped with every phrase and every snippet of an interview having a bearing on his future and toward influencing other writers and directors。 。。。more

Joanna ，

I received a free ARC of this book from NetGalley。I loved the refreshing way this book was organized。 The thematic take on Hitchcock’s life was very interesting。 I do wish that the author had picked one or two movies to focus on for each side of Hitch。 Sometimes it felt like the same idea was repeated each time a movie was mentioned。 I also found the ending abrupt。 The book had a lovely introduction & needed a concluding chapter。

Dan ，

My thanks to NetGalley and W。 W。 Norton & Company for an advanced copy of this book。 Edmund White in The Twelve Lives of Alfred Hitchcock An Anatomy of the Master of Suspense has written one of the most interesting studies of the director that I've read。 Informative， not gossipy， with plenty of facts and interviews and interpretations。 Mr。 White covers Mr。 Hitchcock's entire cover from his start writing lines for silent films to his last movie in the 1970'。 Even some of the movies that have been My thanks to NetGalley and W。 W。 Norton & Company for an advanced copy of this book。 Edmund White in The Twelve Lives of Alfred Hitchcock An Anatomy of the Master of Suspense has written one of the most interesting studies of the director that I've read。 Informative， not gossipy， with plenty of facts and interviews and interpretations。 Mr。 White covers Mr。 Hitchcock's entire cover from his start writing lines for silent films to his last movie in the 1970'。 Even some of the movies that have been thought lost to time are examined， which is sad to think that such a great director could have lost works。 Each chapter is devoted to a different theme， such as "The Dandy" or "The Londoner"， and covers the director's career from that view。 The book shows a different side to the cold maker of thrillers fat fellow that seems so familiar， presenting a man who serial dieted， loved his wife， and fashion， but maybe did not like himself。 His treatment of his leading women is examined， and found to be lacking in some areas， possibly criminal in others。 A compelling biography about a very complex man。 。。。more

Bargain Sleuth Book Reviews ，

For this and other book reviews， visit www。bargain-sleuth。comI’m not quite sure when I discovered Alfred Hitchcock’s movies。 It was sometime after Nancy Drew books and James Bond films aired on commercial television as the movie of the week。 My best friend’s parents had a small selection of movies and we watched and re-watched Rear Window and To Catch a Thief over and over。 Then， my freshman year in high school， we had a teacher who looked so much like Anthony Perkins in Psycho， we couldn’t help For this and other book reviews， visit www。bargain-sleuth。comI’m not quite sure when I discovered Alfred Hitchcock’s movies。 It was sometime after Nancy Drew books and James Bond films aired on commercial television as the movie of the week。 My best friend’s parents had a small selection of movies and we watched and re-watched Rear Window and To Catch a Thief over and over。 Then， my freshman year in high school， we had a teacher who looked so much like Anthony Perkins in Psycho， we couldn’t help but dive deeper into the Hitchcock library of films。 The Twelve Lives of Alfred Hitchcock: An Anatomy of the Master of Suspense by Edward White explores Hitch’s films and life through twelve different facets of his personality。Who was the man behind some of cinema’s most classic suspense films？ That’s what The Twelve Lives of Alfred Hitchcock attempts to explore， through different parts of his personality。 Some chapters work better than others。 “The Boy Who Couldn’t Grow Up”， “The Family Man”， and “The Voyeur” were some of the better chapters because they rely on Hitchcock’s real life as well as his films to study his personality。“The Man of God” was very interesting; I had no idea Hitchcock was raised Catholic。 Either this wasn’t mentioned in the biography I read years ago or it wasn’t touched upon other than a mention。 White shows how certain Catholic teachings remained with Hitchcock as an adult， even though he did not go out of his way to show his Catholicism。 But his daughter was raised Catholic and her children as well， and when Hitch was at the end of his life， he had regular visits from a priest to receive communion and a prayer service。 I always thought I Confess， the Hitchcock movie that has a priest being accused of murder because he can’t reveal the confession of the real murderer due to his oat a rather good film， but Hitchcock didn’t like the end result。“The Voyeur” was also a treat to read， because really， all Hitchcock’s films are about voyeurism in one way or another， but none so much as Rear Window， where James Stewart is house-bound by a broken leg and he looks out on the apartment building across the courtyard of his Greenwich Village home。 Hitchcock took great delight in showing us things that hadn’t been seen before in movies， like a toilet in a bathroom in Psycho， or a woman still half-dressed after a mid-day romp in the same film。The book goes back and forth in time， discussing Hitchcock’s films from Hollywood as well as his time in England。 Indeed， I found a wealth of information about his early films， of which I’ve only seen a few。 I’ve never seen his silent films， but count The 39 Steps and his original version of The Man Who Knew Too Much one of my favorite of his。 He enjoyed the story so much he later re-filmed it in Hollywood with James Stewart and Doris Day。 I enjoy both films， but the original seems more intense。“The Fat Man” was a chapter I had issues with， only because in this day and age to call someone fat is offensive。 Hitchcock constantly referred to himself as fat， and made frequent references to his girth。 His repeated diets， his drawing of the Hitchcock silhouette with the extra chin， in fact， walking on camera in profile so one could see that rotund silhouette was something Hitch never shied from。 He often made jokes at his own expense， which can be seen as a defensive mechanism: laugh about yourself so others don’t start teasing you。Still， despite the thorough look at Hitchcock’s life through these facets of personality， I found him a man hard to know。 He kept so much of himself private that only his wife and daughter and later grandchildren really knew him。 Hitch constantly projected this serious side when in public， but he had an incredible sense of humor， which is often found in his films to break up the suspense。 I’ve seen home movies of Hitchcock where he’s laughing and playing about in his rolled up shirt sleeves， and they’re odd to see since he always projected this image of a proper English gentleman with his dark suits and droll way of talking。The Twelve Lives of Alfred Hitchcock is released to the general public April 13， 2021。 Thanks to NetGalley and W。W。 Norton Company for the ARC in exchange for my honest review。 All opinions are my own。 。。。more

Nancy ，

Alfred Hitchcock。 His name alone can brings chills， fond spooky memories， discomfort， and nostalgia。 I was still ten years old in 1963 when I saw The Birds from the back seat of the family car， parked at the local drive-in movie theater。 My parents thought I would fall asleep。I didn't。 The scene of a man missing his eye balls gave me nightmares for years。 The next year， in 1964， I was nearly twelve when I saw Marnie。 I am sure my folks did not expect me to be asleep that time。 I did not underst Alfred Hitchcock。 His name alone can brings chills， fond spooky memories， discomfort， and nostalgia。 I was still ten years old in 1963 when I saw The Birds from the back seat of the family car， parked at the local drive-in movie theater。 My parents thought I would fall asleep。I didn't。 The scene of a man missing his eye balls gave me nightmares for years。 The next year， in 1964， I was nearly twelve when I saw Marnie。 I am sure my folks did not expect me to be asleep that time。 I did not understand it， I had no concept of sexual dysfunction， so of course watched it every time it came on television， trying to puzzle out the feelings it raised in me。 Alfred Hitchcock Presents （1955-1962） was a childhood staple。 I learned the theme song， The Funeral March of the Marionette， on piano。 It impressed the neighbor boy who was also a Hitchcock fan。 I had story collections like Alfred Hitchcock's Ghostly Gallery: Eleven Spooky Stories for Young People。Over the years， watching the classic films I had seen in the movie theater with my folks， including Vertigo。 Rear Window， and North By Northwest， and those I only saw later on television， like Psycho， I understood things I could not as a girl。And I wondered why in the world did Mom take me to see those films！ Today， scenes of rape， obsession， murder， and suicide would not be considered proper fare for the under-13-year-old child。As far as I can tell， the only harm these movies did me， other than nightmares about eyeless men， was a penchant for stylish suspense stories。 I knew that birds would not flock and attack me in reality， or crop dusters chase me。 "He was a child， you know， a very black-comedy child" screenwriter Arthur Laurents said of Hitch。 Perhaps that was his appeal to children。 Raised on Dick and Jane while undergoing 'duck and cover' drills and watching adults glued to the news during the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis， we were ready for the safety of theatrical horror。 War became daily television fodder and political assassinations punctuated our teen years and watching Hitchcock movies on television were not as shocking any more。I had never explored the man behind the persona。 The nine-line sketch Hitch walked into on his show was all I needed to know。 The sketch， I learned in The Twelve Lives of Alfred Hitchcock， Hitch himself drew and propagated as part of his image。Edward White's biography considers the man through the lens of twelve aspects of his personality， each fully explored through Hitchcock's life and art。 On the one hand， the book is hugely informative and gave me a full picture of the man and the artist。On the other hand， Hitchcock remains a mystery。 He carefully controlled his persona， as deliberately and thoughtfully controlling our image of him as his films controlled our responses。Was his marriage to Alma platonic？ Did he remain a virgin expect for once， resulting in the birth of his daughter？ Did he lunge at actresses and ask his secretary to 'erotically entertain' him？ I saw Tippi Hendren talk about her experience。 Can we tell the difference between the persona Hitch offered and truth？He grew up with WWI air raids， the 1918 flu pandemic， in a rough part of town， with a Catholic Education。 There is a lot of horror to draw from with that background。 And yet， Hitch was averse to conflict and could not deal with "complex emotions。" He would not use animal cruelty in his films and preferred to have his victims thrown off a building than shot as in American films。 Still， he was fascinated by violence and cruelty， grew up reading classic British crime fiction including G。 K。 Chesterton and John Buchan。 He once expressed his belief that he would have made a great criminal lawyer。I learned about his middle class， Catholic childhood， his struggle with his appearance， the art and film and stories that inspired him。The book is always fascinating， always interesting， and often disturbing。 Especially when I ask myself what kind of person is a Hitchcock fan， as perhaps it reveals things about myself I would rather not consider。I received a free galley from the publisher through NetGalley。 My review is fair and unbiased。 。。。more

Diane ，

In The Twelve Lives of Alfred Hitchcock， Edward White employs a unique approach to discussing the life and work of Alfred Hitchcock。 Instead of the expected chronological listing of events， evaluating both his work and personal development along the path of a lifetime， White compartmentalizes attributes of the man and his work into 12 categories: "The Boy Who Couldn’t Grow Up”; “The Murderer”; “The Auteur”; “The Womanizer”; “The Fat Man”; “The Dandy”; “The Family Man”; “The Voyeur”; “The Enterta In The Twelve Lives of Alfred Hitchcock， Edward White employs a unique approach to discussing the life and work of Alfred Hitchcock。 Instead of the expected chronological listing of events， evaluating both his work and personal development along the path of a lifetime， White compartmentalizes attributes of the man and his work into 12 categories: "The Boy Who Couldn’t Grow Up”; “The Murderer”; “The Auteur”; “The Womanizer”; “The Fat Man”; “The Dandy”; “The Family Man”; “The Voyeur”; “The Entertainer”; “The Pioneer”; “The Londoner”; “The Man of God。” Each section covering the span of his life and career from the point of view of that one characteristic。 While much of what Mr。 White writes has been written about and discussed by others （he freely gives credit to his sources）， there are a few tidbits and food for thought that will engage even the most learned Hitchcock devotee。 By simply threading together personal experiences and career milestones with these twelve individually colored threads， you see the whole tapestry in a new light。 I must confess that I have spent many hours in the dark watching Hitchcock films， have read many books and written analytical papers on the works of Alfred Hitchcock。 I have a BA in Radio， Television and Film and have always had an affinity for his work。 This bond was made even greater when I discovered we share the same birthday （luckily， different years）。 I write this sitting in front of a gallery of Hitchcock artwork collected and given to me through the years。 All of this is to say that I would gladly have this book sitting along the many others I own on Alfred Hitchcock。 It is an entertaining and informative read for both the interested filmgoer and film students alike。 。。。more

D L ，

Broken down into twelve sections， the book tries to uncover how Hitchcock the man and how his many characteristics and events in his life managed to shape what appeared on the screen。 The twelve sections each take an aspect of the director's life such as The Fat Man， The Dandy， The Family Man and The Voyeur， trying to peel back a layer to the director to paint a fuller picture of him。 The structure of Edward White's book does not follow a chronological timeline but dips in and out of Hitchcock's Broken down into twelve sections， the book tries to uncover how Hitchcock the man and how his many characteristics and events in his life managed to shape what appeared on the screen。 The twelve sections each take an aspect of the director's life such as The Fat Man， The Dandy， The Family Man and The Voyeur， trying to peel back a layer to the director to paint a fuller picture of him。 The structure of Edward White's book does not follow a chronological timeline but dips in and out of Hitchcock's life， piecing together from many sources， sometimes contradicting the man himself who was also a constant self-publicist but also had a habit of reshaping the narrative of his own life during interviews。This is a book that can sit next to any analytical study of Hitchcock's films and will be a benefit to any film fan looking to learn more about the great director。 This book was provided by NetGalley and the publisher for an honest review。 。。。more

Literary Redhead ，

Edward White unravels the conundrum of filmmaker Alfred Hitchcock — “a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma，” as Churchill once said about Russia。 His films still mesmerize but his reputation has been tarnished， especially since release of Tippi Hedren’s 2016 memoir， in which she documents his sexual abuse of her， and as scholarly papers explore his misogyny。 White explains Hitch’s many contradictions in this brilliant bio， which reveals his essence through 12 thoughtful chapters: The Bo Edward White unravels the conundrum of filmmaker Alfred Hitchcock — “a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma，” as Churchill once said about Russia。 His films still mesmerize but his reputation has been tarnished， especially since release of Tippi Hedren’s 2016 memoir， in which she documents his sexual abuse of her， and as scholarly papers explore his misogyny。 White explains Hitch’s many contradictions in this brilliant bio， which reveals his essence through 12 thoughtful chapters: The Boy Who Couldn’t Grow Up， The Murderer， The Auteur， The Womanizer， The Fat Man， The Dandy， The Family Man， The Voyeur， The Entertainer， The Pioneer， The Londoner， and The Man of God。 This kaleidoscopic approach helped me understand， for example， why I love “Rear Window，” yet why the relationship between characters Jimmy Stewart and Grace Kelly made me cringe。 She has brains， beauty， and style （those Edith Head costumes！） but he gives her wounding mixed messages about her desirability。 It’s typical of many male-female interactions in his films and truly maddening！ A must-read for Hitch fans and film buffs， and those who love substantive bios that entertain。 5 of 5 Stars Pub Date 13 Apr 2021#TheTwelveLivesofAlfredHitchcock #NetGalley Thanks to the author， W。 W。 Norton & Company， and NetGalley for the ARC。 Opinions are mine。 。。。more

Dave ，

Great artists can be jerks: I don't think that's a surprise to anyone。 （I am always arguing that they don't *have* to be）。 And I am privileged enough to be able to decide how much their jerkiness matters to me when I read or listen to or see their work。 I find filmmakers to be the hardest to process: I can decide pretty easily whether to take or leave the work of Ernest Hemingway and William Burroughs， Wagner or John Lennon， Gauguin or Pablo Picasso。 I find it easier to keep their personalities Great artists can be jerks: I don't think that's a surprise to anyone。 （I am always arguing that they don't *have* to be）。 And I am privileged enough to be able to decide how much their jerkiness matters to me when I read or listen to or see their work。 I find filmmakers to be the hardest to process: I can decide pretty easily whether to take or leave the work of Ernest Hemingway and William Burroughs， Wagner or John Lennon， Gauguin or Pablo Picasso。 I find it easier to keep their personalities and actions separate from their work， and unless the work itself is specifically or spectacularly offensive， I can balance the person and the work in my head without a lot of cognitive dissonance。 But the works of filmmakers --and also， I suppose， photographers， and comedians--are harder for me to keep separate。 I find it very hard to like （or even appreciate） Woody Allen at all the way I did when I was in college， after seeing Husbands and Wives--and seeing Manhattan again after #MeToo。 But I still love Love and Death， just like I still love parts of the early albums of Bill Cosby， and I have yet to come to terms with that。 Hitchcock is like that for me--I think Rear Window， Vertigo， Shadow of a Doubt and Psycho are all works of genius and are among my favorite movies。 But Hitchcock himself is trouble， and how do you keep him out of the discussion when you can see what he did to Tippi Hedren right there on screen in The Birds？ Can you have him as an auteur and visionary without also seeing him as a sadist and a womanizer？ All that is to say that this biography is able to address the issue effectively by using different ways of looking at Hitchcock in each chapter。 Instead of feeling that there has to be a unified story that agrees with everyone's opinions of Hitchcock， this reads much more like an oral history， where the reader looks at Hitchcock as an Auteur， as a Womanizer， as an Entertainer （which includes a bit on his sadism） and nine other ways。 There is a very loose chronological structure， but White is freed by this method to fold in any time periods and movies from Hitchcock's life。 It works very well with Hitchcock's complicated personality。White is a good writer， so he manages to handle the whole very well， and only the last couple chapters （Hitchcock as Londoner， Hitchcock as Catholic） don't really seem to work。 This is not the book to learn about Hitchcock's accomplishments in filming （it is very non-technical）， but it is the first view of Hitchcock I've read that seems to get behind the cartoonish and fictionalized view of himself that Hitchcock （and others） created and that most bios seem to embrace。 Is he still a jerk？ Yes， to a lot of people。 Is he still a genius？ Yes， to a lot of people。 He also seems human， for once。I read this as an ARC。 。。。more

Matt ，

4。5 stars

Reference

google book https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=The Twelve Lives of Alfred Hitchcock: An Anatomy of the Master of Suspense

hathitrust digital library https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/ls?q1=The Twelve Lives of Alfred Hitchcock: An Anatomy of the Master of Suspense&field1=ocr&a=srchls&ft=ft&lmt=ft

The British Library https://bll01.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/search?query=any,contains,The Twelve Lives of Alfred Hitchcock: An Anatomy of the Master of Suspense&tab=LibraryCatalog&search_scope=Not_BL_Suppress&vid=44BL_INST:BLL01&lang=en&offset=0